Wednesday, July 8, 2009

Local - Pesticides: Acceptable or unacceptable risk?

Post a comment View comments (5) View latest comment

Last updated at 1:47 AM on 08/07/09

Pesticides: Acceptable or unacceptable risk?
The Western Star

Charlene Johnson, the provincial environment minister, in response to a call for a provincial ban on the use and sale of pesticides has stated that pesticides are federally registered for use and that they pose “minimal health risk.” Health Canada and the federal Pesticide Management Regulatory Agency in fact recognizes that pesticides are toxic substances designed to kill “target species” and registers and approves their use on the basis of what they consider to be an “acceptable risk” to the health of Canadians. The governments of Quebec and Ontario which have passed legislation banning the use and sale of pesticides for cosmetic purposes, the numerous municipalities who have passed bylaws banning pesticides, and the many health and environmental organizations across Canada obviously recognize that Canada’s national pesticide regulatory system, does not adequately protect us. The federal regulatory system puts at “unacceptable risk” our more vulnerable population — small children, pregnant women and nursing mothers. Some of the more commonly expressed limitations of the federal government’s pesticide registration and regulation system include: — The Pesticide Management Regulatory Agency is careful to warn users that pesticides are toxic., which is their essence, substances created to kill target species. The problem is it is not possible to confine their effects to target species. — The regulatory agency decides that the risk to human health is acceptable, based on data submitted by the registering company. It depends upon companies submitting all relevant data.
— The lab tests are done on small numbers of animals, making it difficult to predict effects in large exposed populations.— Each pesticide is tested by itself, which means that the interaction effects with the many other pollutants in the environment, as well as the combined effect of all, are not considered.
— Ethics prevent testing from being done on humans, so lab tests are done on animals that are imperfect models for humans, particularly for humans at formative and vulnerable stages of their lives.
— The “acceptable risk” determination made by the pesticide agency assumes that users closely follow all the instructions and procedures to reduce risk. Many users are unaware of or routinely disregard these requirements: they do not wear adequate protection when applying pesticides, they do not use correct concentrations or volumes, they apply at the wrong time (and frequency) and in the wrong weather (e.g., worsening the drift problem by spraying in high winds), they do not stop people and animals from entering sprayed areas at the highest risk times, and they do not safely store pesticides. Regarding the provincial environment minister’s concerns about the economic impact of a ban on the lawn and garden care industry, experience shows that where there have been bans on the sale and use of cosmetic pesticides (e.g. Halifax) that far from hurting the lawn care industry, employment and the number of businesses and people employed actually increases. The government of Newfoundland and Labrador, Department of Health and Community Services has stated in reports and policy documents that the “key to achieving good health is the prevention of disease” and “that improving the overall health of our population is a priority of government.”It is about time that, as is the case in Quebec and Ontario, protecting the public from unnecessary exposure to pesticides became part of our government’s public wellness and prevention policy. We have seen a response in the media from the environment minister regarding this matter. We have heard nothing from the health minister in this regard. What is Mr. Wiseman’s position on this important health issue? Best Blogger Tips
  • Stumble This Post
  • Save Tis Post To Delicious
  • Share On Reddit
  • Fave On Technorati
  • Buzz This Post
  • Tweet This Post
  • Digg This Post
  • Share On Facebook
Blog Gadgets

St. John's Daily Spray Advisory

My Past Articles

More enforcement needed for pesticide spray regulations
The Western Star (Corner Brook) - Final - 10-01-2002 - 413 words
Karen Griffin - Judie Squires says someone needs to patrol the companies that spray residential areas for pesticides because she's observed nine violations of the Environmental Protection Act in her Paradise neighborhood alone

Spray woes: Province falling down on monitoring pesticides
The Telegram (St. John's) - Final - 10-01-2002 - 253 words
Judie Squires - environment to become poisoned? A temporary ban on all residential pesticides has to be put into place, to protect us, our wildlife and our environment as a whole. Judie Squires Paradise

Government lax on cosmetic pesticide regulation: advocate
The Telegram (St. John's) - 08-28-2004 - 613 words
Stokes Sullivan, Deana - Despite increased awareness about adverse health effects from pesticides, Judie Squires, a member of the Pesticide Working Group of Newfoundland and Labrador, isn't optimistic the province will ban cosmetic use

Woman doesn't expect cosmetic pesticide ban any time soon
The Western Star (Corner Brook) - 08-30-2004 - 712 words
Stokes Sullivan, Deana - Despite increased awareness about adverse health effects from pesticides, Judie Squires, a member of the Pesticide Working Group of Newfoundland and Labrador, isn't optimistic that the province will ban the

Province lagging behind in pesticide control
The Telegram (St. John's) - 09-04-2005 - 496 words
Squires, Judie - it to do is to prohibit the cosmetic use of synthetic pesticides altogether in order to protect our citizens and the environment. Judie Squires writes from Portugal Cove-St. Philip's

The two sides to pesticide use
The Telegram (St. John's) - 07-16-2006 - 781 words
Judie Squires - health of your families. When Canada's most respected health authorities tell us pesticides threaten our health, we should all be listening. Judie Squires writes from Portugal Cove-St. Philip's

Inquiry implicates BTk
The Telegram (St. John's) - 06-24-2006 - 353 words
DEANA STOKES SULLIVAN - of trees. The live spores can be inhaled by humans and animals exposed to BT. Judie Squires, secretary of the Northeast Avalon Group of the Sierra Club, says despite claims that

Delayed pesticide laws 'disappointing'
The Telegram (St. John's) - 06-24-2006 - 833 words
DEANA STOKES SULLIVAN - at the end of this year. These products will only be sold to certified dealers. Judie Squires, secretary of the newly formed Northeast Avalon Group of the Sierra Club, isn't

Above Articles available through Trancontinental Newsnet

Time for provincial lawn pesticide regulation
The Telegram (St. John's) - 03-14-2009 - 419 words
pesticides. Please join me in lobbying our province for a pesticide ban Judie Squires Portugal Cove...

Online Marketing -